Initializing terminal quote pipeline...

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

EL

ELSA Berhad

ELSA0458ShariahListed

Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd · ACE Market · Listing 16 Jun 2026

Open
21 May 2026
Close
03 Jun 2026
Ballot
05 Jun 2026
Allot
12 Jun 2026
List
16 Jun 2026

Auto Summary

IPO Price
RM0.23
Shares After IPO
538.40 M
Market Cap
RM123,832,000
Revenue
RM264,664,000
PAT
RM10,759,000
Revenue CAGR
23.4%
PAT CAGR
-3.4%
EPS
2.00 sen
IPO PER
11.5x
NA/share
RM0.13
P/B
1.77x
ROE
22.1%
Gearing
0.1x
Current Ratio
2.04x
Growth Score
6.3/10
Risk Score
2.8/10

Revenue

173.69 M
2023
222.88 M
2024
264.66 M
2025

PAT

11.52 M
2023
10.50 M
2024
10.76 M
2025

Margins & Gearing

GP Margin
202314.3%
202411.3%
202511.3%
PAT Margin
20236.6%
20244.7%
20254.1%
Gearing
20230.25x
20240.29x
20250.10x

Utilisation Of Proceeds

Consultant-related expenses for existing projects20.9%
Consultant-related expenses for future projects39.2%
Development of internal capabilities for the management and deployment of AUV11.0%
Procurement of drones5.1%
Working capital9.7%
Defrayment of expenses in relation to the Listing13.9%
Growth Allocation
55.4%
Listing Expense Flag
13.9%

Valuation Breakdown

Conservative
RM0.30
15x PER · +30.3%
Base
RM0.36
18x PER · +56.4%
Bull
RM0.40
20x PER · +73.8%
IPORM0.23
ConservativeRM0.30
BaseRM0.36
BullRM0.40
CurrentRM0.23

Category Scores

7.2
Financial Strength7.3/10
Profitability6/10
Growth Prospect6.3/10
Balance Sheet9/10
Valuation8/10
Risk2.8/10

Growth Vs Risk Matrix

SpeculativeAttractive Growth IPOAvoidDefensive
ELSA: Growth 6.3/10 · Risk 2.8/10

Growth increases upward and risk decreases to the right, so the most attractive IPOs sit in the top-right quadrant.

Listing Gain
subscribe
1-3 Year Hold
accumulate
Conclusion

ELSA is growing fast and earning no more for it. Revenue compounded 23.4% a year to RM264.7m, the largest top line across both batches, yet PAT attributable has sat near RM10.5m since FYE2023 because gross margin fell from 14.34% to 11.29% and PAT margin more than halved to 4.07%. That is the signature of a manpower-led model winning work on price. Earnings quality is further qualified by cash falling 44.7% to RM11.8m in a record revenue year, indicating growth is being funded through receivables. Against that, the balance sheet is the cleanest here: 0.10x gearing and a 2.04x current ratio. The proceeds plan is coherent - 55.4% funds consultant capacity for future projects plus AUV and drone capability, which is the intended route out of low-margin manpower supply. At 11.5x earnings and 1.8x pro forma book, the pricing is reasonable if that transition works. Principal risk is oil and gas capex cyclicality landing before margins recover. On balance the combination of the batch's cleanest balance sheet, a modest multiple and a proceeds plan aimed squarely at the margin problem supports participation, with the medium-term case resting on evidence that the AUV and digital work lifts margin rather than just revenue.

Strengths

- Revenue compounded 23.4% a year to RM264.7m, the largest top line in either batch. - Gearing fell to 0.10x, the lowest of any company across both batches. - Current ratio improved to 2.04x. - Asset-light model requires little fixed capital to scale headcount against contract wins.

Weaknesses

- PAT attributable has been flat near RM10.5m for three years despite 52% revenue growth. - PAT margin more than halved from 6.63% to 4.07%. - Cash fell 44.7% in FYE2025 to RM11.8m as receivables absorbed growth. - No MITI tranche, unlike most of the batch.

Opportunities

- AUV capability and drone procurement move the group into higher-value inspection work. - Digital infrastructure and robotics diversify away from pure manpower supply. - Regional operators outsourcing specialist engineering favour asset-light providers.

Threats

- Oil price weakness translates quickly into deferred operator spending. - A manpower-led model competes largely on price, which is visible in the margin trend. - Receivable concentration with large operators exposes the group to payment timing.

IPO Balloting Calculator

Tier snapping, subscription cost, and expected-value estimate.

Recommended Units
50,100
Cost
RM11,523
Success Rate
5.39%
Open EV
RM124
Mid EV
RM310
UnitsTierCostSuccessOpen ProfitOpen EVHold ProfitHold EV
1001RM233.71%RM5RM0RM12RM0
3002RM693.90%RM14RM1RM35RM1
1,1003RM2534.09%RM51RM2RM127RM5
2,1004RM4834.27%RM97RM4RM242RM10
3,1005RM7134.46%RM143RM6RM357RM16
4,1006RM9434.64%RM189RM9RM472RM22
6,1007RM1,4034.83%RM281RM14RM702RM34
11,1008RM2,5535.01%RM511RM26RM1,277RM64
20,1009RM4,6235.20%RM925RM48RM2,312RM120
50,10010RM11,5235.39%RM2,305RM124RM5,762RM310
100,10011RM23,0235.57%RM4,605RM257RM11,512RM641
200,10012RM46,0235.76%RM9,205RM530RM23,012RM1,325
500,10013RM115,0235.94%RM23,005RM1,367RM57,512RM3,418
1,000,10014RM230,0236.13%RM46,005RM2,820RM115,012RM7,049
2,000,10015RM460,0236.32%RM92,005RM5,810RM230,012RM14,525
5,000,10016RM1,150,0236.50%RM230,005RM14,952RM575,012RM37,380
10,000,10017RM2,300,0236.69%RM460,005RM30,758RM1,150,012RM76,895

The trailing 100 units are intentional: applying just over a boundary, such as 20,100 instead of 20,000, lands in the next balloting tier. Success rate is a heuristic, not published balloting odds.

IPO Autopsy is for educational and research purposes only and is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to subscribe for securities.